In September. 15, Moody’s Ratings changed the outlook on Bangladesh’s sovereign credit rating to “stable” from “negative,” while leaving the actual long-term rating unchanged at B2.
The agency said the acute political and external pressures behind its previous negative outlook had eased, helped by stronger foreign-exchange reserves, record remittances and reduced political uncertainty following the February election.
That distinction matters.
Bangladesh is still rated B2 by Moody’s, deep inside what financial markets call speculative-grade territory. The agency hasn’t concluded that Bangladesh has suddenly become a substantially safer borrower. It has concluded that, at the current B2 level, the risks of deterioration are no longer tilted overwhelmingly downward.
The other two members of the “Big Three” are less comfortable.
S&P Global Ratings rates Bangladesh B+, with a negative outlook, after changing the outlook from stable on July 27. Fitch Ratings also has Bangladesh at B+ with a negative outlook, following a similar move on May 13.
The scoreboard therefore looks like this: Moody’s — B2/stable; S&P — B+/negative; Fitch — B+/negative.
Business and economic prospect wise, that is a mixed signal rather than an all-clear.
A sovereign credit rating is essentially an assessment of a government's ability and willingness to repay its debt. The lower the rating, the greater the credit risk perceived by lenders and investors.
The “outlook” is different. It indicates the likely direction in which the rating could move over the medium term.
So Moody’s action didn't move Bangladesh from B2 to B1. Instead, it removed the warning that another downgrade was more likely than not. The country's creditworthiness remains constrained by weak public finances, banking-sector problems and structural weaknesses.
The balance of risks however has changed. Moody’s pointed to foreign-exchange reserves of around $32.9 billion by mid-2026, compared with roughly $21.4 billion at the end of 2024. Record remittances, greater use of formal banking channels and a more flexible exchange-rate regime have strengthened the external buffer. Political uncertainty has also declined since the election, in Moody’s assessment.
That helps explain an apparent contradiction: Bangladesh can have an improving credit outlook while factories struggle to obtain gas and electricity.
Credit ratings aren't assessments of whether an economy is functioning comfortably today. They focus heavily on whether a sovereign can meet its financial obligations and withstand shocks. Rising reserves and remittances improve that calculation even while an energy shortage damages factories.
And that shortage is real.
Gas supply has only just returned to roughly its pre-July crisis level. On September 15, total supply reached about 2,610 million cubic feet a day after weeks of disruption caused partly by problems at an LNG terminal. Factories had faced lower output, higher costs and production disruptions.
The underlying shortage hasn't disappeared. Bangladesh's normal gas demand-supply gap has exceeded 1,300 mmcfd, while gas supplies roughly 40% of annual electricity generation. During the recent disruption, load-shedding repeatedly exceeded 3 gigawatts.
That is where S&P's more pessimistic assessment becomes important.
S&P said this week that high energy costs were specifically among the factors behind its July decision to put Bangladesh on a negative outlook. It warned that prolonged energy-market disruption could widen the current-account deficit and weaken the economy.
Fitch has made a similar argument. Its May action reflected Bangladesh's exposure to the Middle East: nearly half its remittances originate there, while crude oil and petroleum products accounted for about 15% of imports in 2025. Fitch also highlighted slow reform, weak governance and banking-sector stress.
In other words, Moody’s is saying Bangladesh has rebuilt enough buffers to make a further deterioration less immediate. S&P and Fitch are saying those buffers could be eroded again.
For businesses, sovereign ratings matter because the government's risk premium rarely stays with the government.
Foreign banks use sovereign risk when assessing Bangladeshi banks, letters of credit, trade-finance lines and corporate borrowers. A weaker sovereign profile can therefore make overseas financing more expensive or harder to obtain. It can also affect foreign investors calculating the return required to justify investing in Bangladesh.
Moody’s move is consequently helpful at the margin. A stable outlook reduces the immediate threat of another Moody’s downgrade and improves the direction of travel perceived by creditors. But it doesn't suddenly deliver cheap money.
Bangladesh remains several steps below investment grade under all three agencies. Two of them still have negative outlooks. More importantly, the problems cited by the agencies are the same problems businesses encounter directly: weak banks, expensive energy, limited fiscal space, sluggish investment and external vulnerability.
S&P says Bangladesh's recovery depends partly on strong remittances, recovery in garments and continued engagement with multilateral lenders. It could lower the rating if trend growth weakens significantly or the external balance sheet deteriorates; stronger growth, reserves and fiscal performance could eventually return the outlook to stable.
Fitch's numbers show why the banking system remains particularly troublesome. Gross non-performing loans had reached 30.6% at the end of 2025, while private-sector credit growth had fallen to around 6% by January 2026. Government revenue remained weak, and the interest-to-revenue ratio had climbed to about 29%, more than twice Fitch's median for B-rated sovereigns.
Energy adds another layer. Manufacturers have been cutting output, rearranging shifts and using more expensive alternative power sources, squeezing margins and threatening delivery schedules. High LNG prices are also forcing the government to spend more on subsidies, creating a link between the electricity problem and the fiscal problem watched by the rating agencies.
That makes Moody’s decision significant, but narrow.
Bangladesh entered 2026 with several risks pointing in the same direction: political uncertainty, falling external buffers, banking stress and pressure on the currency. By September, one part of that equation had clearly improved. Reserves have recovered and political uncertainty has diminished enough for Moody’s to remove its negative outlook.
But the country hasn't received a credit-rating upgrade. It has bought itself some breathing room.
Whether that eventually becomes an actual upgrade—or whether S&P and Fitch move the other way—will depend on whether factories can get gas, whether electricity can be supplied without imposing an unsustainable fiscal cost, whether banks can clean up bad loans, whether exports recover and whether reserves continue to rise.
–