Yunus's foreign policy reset becomes BNP's first geopolitical test: ORF

The foreign policy legacy carved out by Bangladesh’s erstwhile interim government is set to become one of the first strategic tests for the newly elected Bangladesh Nationalist Party administration. 

According to a comprehensive study published by India’s Observer Research Foundation (ORF) titled Bangladesh in the Indo-Pacific an Analysis of the Interim Government's Foreign Policy, the country’s strategic landscape underwent an intense recalibration following the collapse of the fifteen year Awami League regime. 

The study outlines how the interim government, headed by Nobel Laureate and Chief Advisor Muhammad Yunus, stepped beyond its fundamental domestic mandate of constitutional stabilization to systematically engineer adjustments with global heavyweight partners, specifically Japan, the United States, China, and India. 

While the report details a cooling of ties with New Delhi due to historical over-alignments, it reveals that the interim administration “successfully broadened Dhaka’s operational space with other major powers.” 

However, as the elected government takes the reins, the analysis warns that absolute strategic balancing, rather than structural ideological realignment, remains Bangladesh's “only viable path to economic survival.”

The bedrock of Bangladesh’s foreign policy, the ORF report says, is inherently tied to its macroeconomic vulnerabilities. The Bay of Bengal sits at a critical maritime chokepoint, acting as a gateway for landlocked subcontinental neighbors and holding coveted hydrocarbon blocks. 

Yet, as the study stresses, Bangladesh's development is entirely contingent on foreign trade, development loans, and project grants. The paper assesses Bangladesh's ties with four key Indo-Pacific partners—the United States, China, Japan and India—which collectively account for a large share of the country's trade, investment, development financing and strategic engagement. 

Japan remains Bangladesh’s largest bilateral development partner, followed closely by China, while India and the United States continue to play critical roles in trade, connectivity, and regional security. 

Under Sheikh Hasina, these dependencies were managed via an unwritten diplomacy of balance, later codified in the 2023 Indo-Pacific Outlook. The ORF study contends that this economic interdependence formed the basis of the Hasina government's balancing strategy, allowing Dhaka to engage simultaneously with Washington's Indo-Pacific agenda, Beijing's Belt and Road Initiative, Japanese infrastructure financing and India's neighbourhood policy. 

The interim administration, however, departed from that formula.

A pivot steered by the interim government 

The “sharpest and most controversial pivot executed by the interim government” lay in its approach to New Delhi. The report notes that one of the most glaring public vulnerabilities of the Awami League was its stark over-alignment with India. 

Upon taking office, the interim government prioritized domestic political reassurance by visibly distancing itself from the previous administration's foreign policy stances. 

In its evaluation of this shift, the ORF report notes that it is in relation to India that the interim government's foreign policy diverged most from the Awami League, apparently without due consideration of the “organic dependencies between the two countries and Bangladesh's national interests.” 

Decades of bilateral integration have bound the two nations together via critical supply chains, cross-border energy cooperation, and subregional trade. The study argues that while political signalling may have been inevitable after the regime change, the resulting deterioration in Bangladesh-India relations risks affecting cross-border connectivity, energy cooperation, regional trade and supply chains that have evolved over decades. 

Rather than advocating a return to previous policies, the report suggests that future governments should distinguish between domestic political rivalries and long-term national interests.

While relations with India cooled, the interim government maximized its engagement with alternative regional pillars, leveraging Bangladesh's undeniable strategic position in the Bay of Bengal to assert autonomy. 

Japan emerged during the interim transition as the most economically indispensable and politically neutral ally. Managing dozens of ongoing Official Development Assistance projects, Tokyo has committed substantial funding to Bangladesh since independence, including crucial pandemic and macroeconomic budgetary support. 

The authors argue that Japanese engagement demonstrates how Bangladesh can deepen strategic partnerships without becoming entangled in great-power rivalry. 

Meanwhile, Beijing effectively leveraged the diplomatic space created by the cooling of Dhaka-New Delhi ties. The interim government expanded “practical economic communication with China, recognizing its position as Bangladesh's second-largest project aid provider and primary source of industrial manufacturing inputs.”

The analysis finds that the interim government expanded engagement with China during the transition period. It says Beijing benefited from the cooling of Dhaka-New Delhi relations, although Bangladesh continued to avoid formally aligning itself with any China-led geopolitical bloc. 

The report notes that China remains indispensable to Bangladesh's infrastructure development, manufacturing imports and investment landscape.

For Washington, the interim government represented “a transparent, highly credible partner on matters of institutional reform, human rights, and democratic transitions.” At the same time, the United States retained strong importance through trade and security dialogue.

The presence of Chief Advisor Yunus “enhanced Dhaka’s diplomatic leverage in Washington,” transforming relations from friction over democratic backsliding into an active collaboration centered on economic governance. 

Ultimately, the study indicates that the interim government’s tenure served as a transformative transitional phase. It effectively broke the mold of unilateral alignment, delivering to the newly elected administration a diversified, albeit more complex, diplomatic landscape.

The space to maneuver, ORF report says, however, is narrowing.

Challenges ahead for the new government 

The escalating great-power competition between the United States and China, coupled with India’s anxieties over its shifting periphery, means that the incoming administration cannot afford reckless policy swings. 

The report notes that after the political transition in 2024, Dhaka's foreign partnerships were thus revised by an unelected government primarily appointed to stabilise the country and steer it towards a democratic election. 

The paper points out that these changes now form the foundation upon which the BNP government will have to build its Indo-Pacific policy.

The new administration’s challenge is defined by the necessity of restoring baseline confidence in all four relationships simultaneously. Bangladesh relies unconditionally on American trade markets, Japanese infrastructure finance, Chinese industrial inputs, and Indian geographic connectivity. 

As the study concludes, any prolonged instability or diplomatic breakdown carries tangible economic penalties that affect the everyday livelihoods of the population. The study repeatedly returns to the country's structural economic constraints. 

Bangladesh depends on export markets in the United States, infrastructure financing from Japan and China, regional connectivity with India, and diversified investment from multiple partners. Any prolonged deterioration in one relationship therefore carries costs that extend well beyond diplomacy. 

The report warns against allowing domestic political narratives to dictate external strategy, and states that nonetheless, the erstwhile interim government's policies marked a shift in Bangladesh's important foreign partnerships, a foundation on which the elected BNP government would have to build its future policy in the Indo-Pacific and which would affect the country's trade and development prospects.

Preserving diplomatic flexibility may ultimately prove more valuable than pursuing any single strategic partnership, says the ORF study. Rather than signaling a permanent geopolitical realignment, the interim government's foreign policy is portrayed as a transitional phase whose long-term consequences will now depend on whether the BNP government restores a broader equilibrium among Bangladesh's most important international partners. 

By steering the nation through an unprecedented domestic crisis while keeping external trade and development mechanisms operational, the interim government successfully protected Bangladesh’s strategic autonomy. It has laid down a diversified diplomatic foundation. 

For the newly elected government, the ORF study says, the ultimate task will be preserving this hard-won flexibility, ensuring that the country remains a friend to all, a partner to many, and a satellite state to none.

—