Derailing the patriarchal script
In Tanim Noor’s adventure-black comedy Bonolota Express, based on Humayun Ahmed’s novel Kichukkhon, the typical engine of subcontinental cinema is systematically derailed.
Bangladeshi celluloid has long been fueled by rigid, market-tested gender archetypes: the stoic, protective patriarch and the self-sacrificing, domestic heroine whose agency is confined to the private sphere.
Audiences, conditioned by a persistent patriarchal framework, traditionally demand these recognizable figures to anchor their narrative engagement. Yet, this dialogue-heavy, psychological exploration of an intertwined train journey boldly steers away from such clichés.
Rather than defining its female characters by the traditional rubrics of biological expectation or passive victimhood, the film treats its ensemble as distinct individuals. Gender is presented as a fluid performance, actively subverting the socio-cultural architecture of contemporary Bangladesh.
This subversion is most visible in the reversal of protective and decisive dynamics. Nitu, a female passenger, operates as the primary shield for her vulnerable father, Aziz, shielding him from the chaos of the train and extending her protection to a ticketless student, Zafor.
Aziz himself embodies the tragic contradictions of traditional masculinity; his preoccupation with societal izzat (honor) initially manifests as a refusal to let a male doctor treat his wife, prioritizing rigid modesty over life itself.
Yet, the narrative disrupts his patriarchal conditioning by showing his eventual intention to bequeath his entire property to Nitu, bypassing his son. The traditional script of male guardianship is completely rewritten in the interactions between Chitra and the successful yet physically frail Dr Ashhab.
Fleeing an arranged marriage to exact revenge on an ex-boyfriend, Chitra refuses the role of the silent victim. When she redirects her affections toward Ashhab, she assumes the active role of the selector…a prerogative historically reserved for men in romantic cinema.
The film literalizes this subversion in a striking visual reversal of the classic cinematic trope: it is the man who runs desperately to catch the moving train, and it is the woman who extends her hand to hoist him aboard.
Even within the political and institutional echelons depicted on the train, the matriarchal subtext dominates. The traveling education minister is a caricature of corrupt, masculine state authority, yet he is entirely eclipsed by his ideologically formidable and politically influential wife.
When crisis forces the passengers to flee, the minister explicitly positions his wife as the group’s primary guardian and protector, openly deferring to her authority over a contingent of able-bodied men. This theme of feminine strength contrasted with masculine vulnerability echoes down the generational ladder.
Among the younger passengers, the student Zafor is stripped of conventional "manly" bravado, presenting instead as a coward, while his companion Rubi emerges as the brave, analytical anchor of their dynamic.
Perhaps the most radical departure from Bangladeshi social expectations lies in the film’s reconfiguration of domestic labor and emotional vulnerability. Professor Boshir, an academic transporting the corpses of his children, represents a profound break from the archetype of the detached father.
Abandoned by his wife immediately after childbirth, Boshir spent his life performing the intensive, solo emotional and physical labor of caregiving—a domain fiercely coded as female in regional culture.
By showcasing his profound grief and historical domesticity, the film normalizes male emotionality and domestic responsibility, stripping it of any perceived emasculation.
Conversely, the film does not romanticize femininity as inherently virtuous; the minister’s sister-in-law is drawn as a vicious, violence-loving agent of chaos married to a mute, passive man, proving that the film's characters are liberated from moralistic gender constraints.
By discarding regional cinematic tropes, Bonolota Express offers a progressive framework for how gender can be actively deconstructed. It challenges the patriarchal gaze that demands women occupy spaces of quiet sacrifice or emotional melodrama.
Instead, Noor delivers a narrative where characters perform their identities based on immediate psychological reality rather than ancestral social contracts. While the film retains enough supernatural intrigue and psychological suspense to satisfy a mainstream public still tethered to the idea of the standard "Hero" and "Heroine," its true triumph lies in its quiet radicalism.
It proves that Bangladeshi cinema can dismantle entrenched societal norms without sacrificing narrative momentum, offering a mirror to a society in transition and signaling that the rigid tracks of traditional gender construction are finally being rewritten.
—
Maliha Namlah is a journalist and activist